Quite possible, the CIO should be looked at as an Information manager rather than a Technology manager. In this heirarchy, Information Technology (CTO) and Information Security (CISO) would be separate but coordinating functions within the broader Information organization.
That seems reasonable, but it strikes me that many CIOs are still operating as, and seen by their organization as "person who runs the administrative technology shop" rather than an information officer. I also think that still ignores that vast amount of 'information' management that takes place outside of IT, with the library being the obvious example.
Quite possible, the CIO should be looked at as an Information manager rather than a Technology manager. In this heirarchy, Information Technology (CTO) and Information Security (CISO) would be separate but coordinating functions within the broader Information organization.
That seems reasonable, but it strikes me that many CIOs are still operating as, and seen by their organization as "person who runs the administrative technology shop" rather than an information officer. I also think that still ignores that vast amount of 'information' management that takes place outside of IT, with the library being the obvious example.